All along we have been declaring, by obvious example with the vaccines and the carrying card, that the mark of the beast is not something directly related to the mark that controls buying and selling. Carrying something or having some tracker to make sure one participates in the program is all that trackers are. The mark itself can be totally unrelated, like compliance to Sunday observance. Consider, the beast, also known as antichrist, seems to "think to change times and laws" (Daniel 7:25). The description of antichrist in the book of Daniel matches the book of Revelation except for one point. That point is that Daniel sees antichrist thinking they can change God's Ten Commandments, specifically the one on time, like the fourth commandment, while John simply connects worship and the word mark together (Revelation 14:9, 11). In other words, what John calls the Mark of the Beast is what ought to be connected to their thought of authority to be able to change God's commandments as declared in Daniel. And now we have a demand to have the G7 implement "climate Sundays", which means to rest on that day, when there is no scripture basis for it. There is no commandment declaring it. There was no pronouncement from Heaven that the day changed. Both events, a commandment and pronouncement, point to the Sabbath day, observed as sunsets between Friday and Saturday.